Comments on: Time as Abstraction http://broodsphilosophy.wordpress.com/2006/08/21/time-as-abstraction/ ....philosophical and other notes.... Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:52:51 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: Tanasije Gjorgoski http://broodsphilosophy.wordpress.com/2006/08/21/time-as-abstraction/#comment-36603 Tanasije Gjorgoski Wed, 09 Jul 2008 10:07:02 +0000 http://broodsphilosophy.wordpress.com/2006/08/21/time-as-abstraction/#comment-36603 Sam, thanks for the comment, but seems that the quantum indeterminacy has affected your sentence. Sam, thanks for the comment, but seems that the quantum indeterminacy has affected your sentence.

]]> By: Sam http://broodsphilosophy.wordpress.com/2006/08/21/time-as-abstraction/#comment-36600 Sam Wed, 09 Jul 2008 01:49:11 +0000 http://broodsphilosophy.wordpress.com/2006/08/21/time-as-abstraction/#comment-36600 Quantum physics really makes what I was taught in school obsolete. Imagine the measurement theory...if you try to measure 2 atoms from one to another it will always be were you're though places it the 2 points. Let your imagination run wild....! Quantum physics really makes what I was taught in school obsolete. Imagine the measurement theory…if you try to measure 2 atoms from one to another it will always be were you’re though places it the 2 points. Let your imagination run wild….!

]]> By: Tanasije Gjorgoski http://broodsphilosophy.wordpress.com/2006/08/21/time-as-abstraction/#comment-23385 Tanasije Gjorgoski Sun, 24 Jun 2007 22:20:23 +0000 http://broodsphilosophy.wordpress.com/2006/08/21/time-as-abstraction/#comment-23385 Hey NooProcess, Can you point to something more specific that you have problems with? Hey NooProcess,

Can you point to something more specific that you have problems with?

]]> By: NooProcess http://broodsphilosophy.wordpress.com/2006/08/21/time-as-abstraction/#comment-23383 NooProcess Sun, 24 Jun 2007 22:08:43 +0000 http://broodsphilosophy.wordpress.com/2006/08/21/time-as-abstraction/#comment-23383 I don't get it. I don’t get it.

]]> By: Danni http://broodsphilosophy.wordpress.com/2006/08/21/time-as-abstraction/#comment-21224 Danni Fri, 08 Jun 2007 14:06:53 +0000 http://broodsphilosophy.wordpress.com/2006/08/21/time-as-abstraction/#comment-21224 this is a true vision of someone that not only looks at what is right infront of them, but looks beyond what the eye can see and takes into account all the possibilities... this is a true vision of someone that not only looks at what is right infront of them, but looks beyond what the eye can see and takes into account all the possibilities…

]]> By: Tanasije Gjorgoski http://broodsphilosophy.wordpress.com/2006/08/21/time-as-abstraction/#comment-2245 Tanasije Gjorgoski Thu, 31 Aug 2006 21:18:33 +0000 http://broodsphilosophy.wordpress.com/2006/08/21/time-as-abstraction/#comment-2245 Thanks for the comment Mark, Isn't it the case that even in quantum mechanics, the time is reduced to a level of observable, and not something absolute? As far as I know, in case of QM one can't speak of e.g. the pair of time and energy as a potential values of wave function as they are pair of conjugate quantities. Thanks for the comment Mark,
Isn’t it the case that even in quantum mechanics, the time is reduced to a level of observable, and not something absolute? As far as I know, in case of QM one can’t speak of e.g. the pair of time and energy as a potential values of wave function as they are pair of conjugate quantities.

]]> By: Mark Butler http://broodsphilosophy.wordpress.com/2006/08/21/time-as-abstraction/#comment-2241 Mark Butler Wed, 30 Aug 2006 07:24:25 +0000 http://broodsphilosophy.wordpress.com/2006/08/21/time-as-abstraction/#comment-2241 Newtonian "proper time" isn't on nearly as shaky a foundation as many suggest. Sure clocks speed up and slow down, but the experimental evidence against Newtonian concepts such as simultaneity simply isn't there. Einstein's brand of relativity has not been demonstrated to the degree necessary to establish what too many keep quoting as scientific fact. Conventional relativity and quantum mechanics aren't even compatible, and the latter has much more detailed evidence in the areas where they conflict than the former. The Alain Aspect experiment, for example. Newtonian “proper time” isn’t on nearly as shaky a foundation as many suggest. Sure clocks speed up and slow down, but the experimental evidence against Newtonian concepts such as simultaneity simply isn’t there.

Einstein’s brand of relativity has not been demonstrated to the degree necessary to establish what too many keep quoting as scientific fact.

Conventional relativity and quantum mechanics aren’t even compatible, and the latter has much more detailed evidence in the areas where they conflict than the former. The Alain Aspect experiment, for example.

]]>